Posts Tagged 'sources'

Power steps down from Obama campaign

Irish journalist, professor and Pulitzer-prize winning author Samantha Power has stepped down as an adviser to Barack Obama over comments she made about his rival Hillary Clinton.

A full-length version of the story can be read here.

I just heard her speak in University College Dublin last night, she is such a talented woman and this is a big loss for the campaign. As a journalist I have huge respect for Ms Power, she has written several fine articles from countries around the world.

Her article about Darfur published in the New Yorker back in 2004 is still one of the finest pieces of journalism I have ever read. (If you haven’t read it already I strongly recommend that you do) Before I read it I was wavering back and forth between Journalism and Music as a career, but after reading if my mind was made up.

All of that aside, there is something else to discuss.

Ms Power apparently made her remarks about Ms Clinton off the record to the Scotsman newspaper. It perhaps wasn’t the smartest move in the world, but nonetheless since when did off the record stop meaning exactly that to reporters? To me off the record is still off the record.

It may be frustrating as hell when a source says something great and you know you can’t do anything with it, but that’s the way the game works. If as journalists we burn sources and print off the record comments people will get scared, hush up and we will never get to the bottom of stories.

The Scotsman may have gotten themselves a story and a whole lot of publicity, but they may well have damaged journalism in the long run.

Medill under the microscope

Very interesting story over on the other side of the Atlantic where I did my masters, read it on the Chicago Tribune website here.

For people who are unfamiliar with the Medill School of Journalism it has one of (if not the) best journalism programmes in the US. It prides itself on training journalists to report the facts of the story accurately and without bias.

While working on my masters I routinely had to hand in lists of sources full names and contact details to my editor/professor for spot checks. The use of anonymous sources is discouraged and can only be used in special cases. For example when I was using illegal immigrants in a story I was allowed to keep their names out of it, but all of their contact details had to be handed over to my editor.

However recently the dean of the Medill, John Lavine, used a quote in a piece of marketing material for one of the school’s more controversial programmes and he failed to attribute it to anyone. The very positive anonymous quote apparently came from one of the students in the class. However a journalist in the student newspaper tracked down all of the students in the class and none recall giving the quote…so it’s a bit of a mystery.

Lavine will not reveal the identity of the source and 16 members of the Medill faculty have come out saying they are ‘deeply troubled’ by the use of anonymous sources. A number of the 16 faculty members who signed the statement taught or edited me during my masters programme.

I find the this whole situation very worrying for Medill. How can the dean of the school be so at odds with its underlying ethos of transparency. Lavine needs to come out and give the name of the source and give proof that he did not fabricate sources or resign from the school before he damages it even further.


Blathnaid Healy

My Twitter Feed

a

All views and opinions are my own. © Blathnaid Healy 2008