Archive for September, 2009

TV ad spend overtaken by online

Joe Trippi points to a Guardian article discussing how internet advertising has outstripped TV advertising for the first time in the UK:

The UK has become the first major economy where advertisers spend more on internet advertising than on television advertising, with a record £1.75bn online spend in the first six months of the year.

The milestone marks a watershed for the embattled TV industry, the leading ad medium in the UK for almost half a century. It has taken the internet little more than a decade to become the biggest advertising sector in the UK.

UK advertisers spent £1.75bn on internet advertising in the six months to the end of June, a 4.6% year-on-year increase, according to a report by the Internet Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers. To put this in perspective, in 1998, when the IAB first measured internet advertising, just £19.4m was spent online.

The internet now accounts for 23.5% of all advertising money spent in the UK, while TV ad spend accounts for 21.9% of marketing budgets.

This may just be a blip caused by advertisers pushing for value for money and seeing online as the route. However long-term internet advertising will more than likely be the dominant form. The Guardian notes some of the problems faced by the industry:

Despite the seemingly inexorable rise of internet ad spend, a closer examination of the IAB’s figures show that the recession has had an impact. In the first quarter £920m was spent on online advertising, representing 8.6% year-on-year growth. However, in the second quarter, spend fell almost £100m to £832m, representing only a 1.1% increase on the amount spent in the same period last year.

Blip aside, this is of course a more worrying story for TV than a positive one for online and it is not wholly good for online either. It would be an easy time for online advocates to get carried away but it should be treated with caution. Especially considering the costs associated with TV production when compared to online and how much TV content is reproduced online with advertising running alongside it. Of course there is a possibility that when economic growth returns the TV spend won’t come along with it and this blip turns more permanent.

Awaiting the next figures with interest.

HT Laura McGann

Flip or Flop?

I think there is definitely potential in Google’s new product Fast Flip, which it is currently trying out in its lab.

What is Fast Flip:

  • Visual way to browse news stories aggregated from a Google search
  • Scrapbook-style screenshots of participating publisher’s pages
  • At the moment it has about 30 plus news sources (including the Washington Post, BBC, the New York Times and Salon)
  • Features categories, recommend, most viewed and headlines as options
  • Has a revenue-share system with the news organisations
  • Pushes users to the content sources if they click on the screen shots

The immediate benefits I see for news organisations:

  • Drives traffic to their own websites
  • Revenue share
  • Stats
  • Greater chance of serendipitous  discovery
  • Hands back more ownership and gives them a chance to reach new readers and most importantly keep them because of greater branding

Benefits for the reader:

  • Better access to the source document (less chance of reading an out-of date article, which can increase with aggregated content)
  • Visually more pleasing than a feed reader and on first look easy to navigate and digest
  • Personalisation options
  • Good for readers who prefer browsing
  • Has much greater appeal to traditional newspaper readers than a feed reader would have

It is in its infancy at the moment and for most people outside the US or UK it won’t be helpful for domestic news until they link up with more organisations.  It doesn’t appear that they have partnered with anyone in Ireland yet.

Is this an olive branch?

Maybe Google are beginning to address the issue of funding news.  After all, if the people who provide news content don’t find a way to fund it – Google will have little in the way of news to aggregate.

To take these thoughts further read Mark Cuban’s post on micro-payments and super-subscriptions, which is something I’ve been thinking about recently as a possible pay model for online news. Also, check out Nieman Journalism Lab’s post, which explores Google’s proposed micro-payment system and looks at a recent document the group submitted to the Newspaper Association of America. I guess if there was a pull quote from Google this is it:

“open” need not mean free’

Hoping to get some time to write more about that document itself, but in the meantime here’s the link.


Blathnaid Healy

My Twitter Feed

a

All views and opinions are my own. © Blathnaid Healy 2008